Coaching and Mentoring
Coaching can be an important aspect of succession planning, especially when we consider that we are preparing people for leadership roles. While training is usually focused and scheduled, coaching can be provided when an opportunity presents itself. Coaching, especially in reference to performance, is not effective at “fixing” a problem like those that are associated with poor performance. It can, however, very effectively be used to prepare future leaders. Coaching and mentoring are different in that mentoring means actually teaching someone a particular skill. If someone is completely new to a subject, mentoring is appropriate. To try to coach someone who has never used a wrench on how to change the oil in their car would not make any sense. That person needs a mentor or teacher. However, for the mechanic who is a valued employee within a shop environment, and who has excellent leadership qualities and the potential to be a critical employee, some coaching can accelerate his evolution into a leadership role.
Good coaches actually take the time and make the effort to learn how to coach. Anyone can call themselves a coach, but some of the key aspects of coaching need to be learned in order to be effectively applied. Coaches lead; they do not teach. A coach approaches something in a way to help someone discover, explore, and ask their own questions (rather than just answer a coach’s questions).
Coaching is available with specialties in certain areas that can really help with succession planning. Executive coaches can help someone who lacks certain skills to develop the skills that will make them successful. For example, when someone is moved into a role before they are completely prepared, they may benefit from job content coaching. In other circumstances, process or image coaching focuses on the impact that the leader projects. Can they carry a conversation, project a confident and professional image during a business lunch or meeting, deliver bad news to staff, or conduct a meeting?